Ken Fields: slideshow image 1
Ken Fields: slideshow image 2
Ken Fields: slideshow image 3
Ken Fields: slideshow image 4
Ken Fields: slideshow image 5

Blog

A Wind Power Boonedoggle

Ahhh geez… Article in the Wall Street Journal by Robert Bryce commenting on how T. Boone Pickens is pulling out of wind power and switching in to Natural Gas, because wind isn’t competitive. I’m not questioning any of the WSJs facts or figures but the story is a little more than just the simple one pager.

Natural Gas is being touted as the savior to our energy crisis, but far from it. Prices may be cheaper but anyone who has done even the slightest bit of research into hydraulic fracturing knows what a disaster it can actually be – causing way more problems than it’s worth… there a nice article on the dangers of fracking over at the Lime Light website.

QUOTE:

“After 30 months, countless TV appearances, and $80 million spent on an extravagant PR campaign, T. Boone Pickens has finally admitted the obvious: The wind energy business isn’t a very good one.

The Dallas-based entrepreneur, who has relentlessly promoted his “Pickens Plan” since July 4, 2008, announced earlier this month that he’s abandoning the wind business to focus on natural gas.

Two years ago, natural gas prices were spiking and Mr. Pickens figured they’d stay high. He placed a $2 billion order for wind turbines with General Electric. Shortly afterward, he began selling the Pickens Plan. The United States, he claimed, is “the Saudi Arabia of wind,” and wind energy is an essential part of the cure for the curse of imported oil.

Voters and politicians embraced the folksy billionaire’s plan. Last year, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he had joined “the Pickens church,” and Al Gore said he wished that more business leaders would emulate Mr. Pickens and be willing to “throw themselves into the fight for the future of our country.”

Alas, market forces ruined the Pickens Plan. Mr. Pickens should have shorted wind. Instead, he went long and now he’s stuck holding a slew of turbines he can’t use because low natural gas prices have made wind energy uneconomic in the U.S., despite federal subsidies that amount to $6.44 for every 1 million British thermal units (BTUs) produced by wind turbines. As the former corporate raider explained a few days ago, growth in the wind energy industry “just isn’t gonna happen” if natural gas prices remain depressed.

In 2008, shortly after he launched his plan, Mr. Pickens said that for wind energy to be competitive, natural gas prices must be at least $9 per million BTUs. In March of this year, he was still hawking wind energy, but he’d lowered his price threshold, saying “The place where it works best is with natural gas at $7.”

That may be true. But on the spot market natural gas now sells for about $4 per million BTUs. In other words, the free-market price for natural gas is about two-thirds of the subsidy given to wind. Yet wind energy still isn’t competitive in the open market.

Despite wind’s lousy economics, the lame duck Congress recently passed a one-year extension of the investment tax credit for renewable energy projects. That might save a few “green” jobs.

But at the same time that Congress was voting to continue the wind subsidies, Texas Comptroller Susan Combs reported that property tax breaks for wind projects in the Lone Star State cost nearly $1.6 million per job. That green job ripoff is happening in Texas, America’s biggest natural gas producer.

Today’s low natural gas prices are a direct result of the drilling industry’s newfound ability to unlock methane from shale beds. These lower prices are great for consumers but terrible for the wind business. Through the first three quarters of 2010, only 1,600 megawatts of new wind capacity were installed in the U.S., a decline of 72% when compared to the same period in 2009, and the smallest number since 2006. Some wind industry analysts are predicting that new wind generation installations will fall again, by as much as 50%, in 2011.

There’s more bad news on the horizon for Mr. Pickens and others who have placed big bets on wind: Low natural gas prices may persist for years. Last month, the International Energy Agency’s chief economist, Fatih Birol, said that the world is oversupplied with gas and that “the gas glut will be with us 10 more years.” The market for natural-gas futures is predicting that gas prices will stay below $6 until 2017.

So what is Mr. Pickens planning to do with all the wind turbines he ordered? He’s hoping to foist them on ratepayers in Canada, because that country has mandates that require consumers to buy more expensive renewable electricity.

How do you say boonedoggle in French?”

- END QUOTE
Original Wall Street Journal Article

Natural Gas : Don’t Believe The Hype, It’s Not The Answer

NYT: Will Electric Cars Finally Succeed

For some reason there seems to be an unusually high number of EV articles in the news these past couple of days. Not sure if this was all kicked off by the announcement that Lance Armstrong had taken delivery of the first Nissan Leaf in the country.

While the news may not be directly attributable to Mr. Armstrong, obviously it is a result of the expected arrival of the Nissan Leaf in December. On October 7th 2010 the New York Times posed the question in their Room For Debate section “Will Electric Cars Finally Succeed?”

It’s a pretty interesting discussion to read, particularly the contributors’ opinions – which collectively sway towards the negative – noting the usual concerns of high cost, low range, range anxiety / lack of infrastructure and charge times.

My interest in the debate is simply to question why we’re even still having it? Battery prices have been dropping, which will reduce the cost to consumer. Time and time again it has been established that a range of 100 miles will suffice for roughly 80% of our daily driving needs, in which case range anxiety shouldn’t come into consideration, but if it does, there is a huge push to begin the process with programs like Coulomb’s ChargePoint America. As for charge times, current Level III charging technology at 480 volts will charge a Tesla roadster in just over an hour (largest EV battery pack on the market).

EVs & PHEVs aren’t even in mass production yet, we are at the very earliest stages in their development. If an EV can currently satisfy up to 80% of our commuting / daily usage then and PHEVs can fill in for 100% of our needs I think it’s safe to say that without a doubt the electric car in some shape or form will succeed.

Our goal should be super high performance PHEVs that run on some sort of biofuel, think algae.

NY Times: Will Electric Cars Finally Succeed
EV World: When In Doubt, Doubt
GreenTechMedia: EV Batteries Plummet In Price
Coulomb Tech: ChargePoint America

Let’s Get Real On Wind Turbine Noise

Wow, really great commentary from Brian Keane of Smart Power in the Huffington Post today. Keane’s article is in response to a New York Times article posted October 5th titled “For Those Near, The Miserable Hum Of Clean Energy”.

The basic gist of the back and forth argument is the perceived noise that wind turbines make. Residents in communities where turbines have ben installed have complained of noise pollution. As Brian points out these people tend to be in the minority, but those who complain tend to be heard the loudest (happy people don’t complain and therefore usually do not provide a voice – unfortunately). Obviously wind turbines are a “charged” issue, but they do work and they do produce clean energy. The industry is very careful about the levels of noise that are produced and do try to minimize the impact as much as possible. As the old saying goes we can’t please all of the people all of the time. In study after study turbines do not produce an excess of sound, sure there are those who will be extra sensitive to it, but it is far from the majority. 45 decibels is just below the normal ambient level of noise in your home and just above a whisper quiet library. For the very vast majority of the planet, other than those with Superman-Like senses we’ll never even notice a turbine spinning. and for those who happen to be gifted with an acute sense of hearing that’s the small price to pay for clean renewable energy.

As Mr. Keane so simply puts it “Alright, Mrs. Lindgren, let us grieve for a moment. Shall we grieve for the days when we brought coal buckets into our homes — polluting not just the outdoor air, but our very living rooms? Do we long for the days when “having electricity” meant installing your family’s one and only light bulb?”

Huffington Post
NY Times

Renewable Energy Bill: 15% by 2021

Uhhhh… disappointing. Kind of a mealy-mouthed bill. 15% by 2021? Weak, but a step in the right direction.

It’s nice to see that this is on the table, but to read the article itself gives little hope that the bill will actually pass this year – with any luck apparently we can keep our fingers crossed for next year.

The renewable energy industry has been waiting for any number of a handful of potential signals from the Federal Government that would give them the green light to ramp up. Any type of a renewable portfolio standard on the State level has been a huge boon to the industry in those States (take the case of New Jersey for instance) and obviously a Federal mandate is great, but 15%, at least in my opinion, is weak.

If you think the bill isn’t going to pass then aim high. Every day in the news we hear this schizophrenic back and forth debate as to whether or not the economy is improving or about to double dip implode all over again and here we are with a “way out” – or at least one potential way out – new industry, new jobs, repower the economy, save money, stop sending money overseas, stop spending taxpayer money on environmental disasters and conflict that could have been avoided in the first place. Guys, writings on the wall – shoot for a 30%.

One of the biggest complaints in the renewable energy argument is that it’s too expansive… if Washington were to send the strong message that they are committed renewable energy companies would invest in the capacity that is needed to drive prices down.

This is not rocket science, prices go down, demand goes up, economies of scale allow companies to profit…

Fox Business Article.
Reuters
BioMass Magazine

Rickshaw Dumpling Bar @ Tavern On The Green

Announced in the news today, Rickshaw Dumplings will be taking it’s place alongside three other mobile trucks at Tavern On The Green in NYC, if all goes well, hopefully within the next couple of weeks. Obviously this is great news for the company. The Tavern On The Green location is fantastic despite the fact that the restaurant has closed, highly trafficked area by locals and tourists alike. Beyond the fact that the location should generate excellent revenue for the business, equally as important is the location to help spread the Rickshaw brand – right now it’s safe to say that Rickshaw is basically a NYC based concept, but with the tourists that come through the area, this is the first step in really expanding beyond the cities borders.

While I have yet to watch an episode, with the recent Food TV series The Great Food Truck Race – the concept is growing much beyond the simple sidewalk stands and is rightfully taking it’s place as foodie destinations with loyal customers.

After much hype from friends, during the short time that I lived in Los Angeles, I made it a point to go out and track down the Korea BBQ Taco truck… following them on twitter and checking out when they would be in the neighborhood. After one aborted attempt, I did manage to catch up with them one night and quite enjoyed the experience.

Foods trucks outside Tavern On The Green – congrats to Kenny and David for getting the spot. The Food Truck concept is well on it’s way to going mainstream.

NY Times: Rickshaw Dumpling, Van Leeuwen Ice Cream and More Coming to Tavern on the Green